Visualize LV Mass Scaling Methods

Interactive tools to explore how different body size scaling methods affect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) diagnosis across patient populations.

Example of LV mass scaling comparison showing how different methods affect the same patient data

Why LV Mass Scaling Matters

Different approaches to body size normalization can lead to different clinical conclusions about the same patient. The choice of scaling method can significantly affect the diagnosis of LVH.

How to Use This Tool

1

Select Methods

Choose which scaling approaches (BSA, height-based, lean body mass, etc.) and reference values to use for comparison. Choose from a curated list or explore on your own

2

Tailor Patient Data

Adjust for patient demographics & anthropometrics.Experiment with different BMI values to see how body composition affects each method.

BMI 30: Obese
3

Explore Across Populations

Compare how different methods perform across diverse patient types. Watch how thresholds shift with changing patient characteristics.

Tall?
Short?
Young?
Old?
4

Gain Clinical Insights

Understand the clinical implications of each scaling approach. When might traditional BSA indexing under- or over-diagnose LVH?

💡

Explore the Tools

LV Mass Scaling

Compare BSA, height-based, and lean body mass approaches for LV mass indexing.

Explore Tool →

Wall Thickness

Explore dimensional analysis approaches to LV posterior wall thickness indexing and scaling.

Explore Tool →

References

Browse the scientific literature and reference studies behind each scaling method.

View References →

About

Learn about the motivation, methodology, and scientific background behind this project.

Learn More →

Interactive LV Mass Scaling Tool

LV Mass Scaling Method Comparison

Some references provide population-specific thresholds

BSA (m²) = 0.007184 × height(cm)^0.725 × weight(kg)^0.425

Uses sex, ethnicity, age, height, weight with specific coefficients for different ethnic groups.

Select a preset to quickly compare different LV mass scaling methods. Each preset demonstrates key methodological concepts and clinical considerations.

Essential Comparison

BSA Methods

Body Composition

Height Methods

Guidelines

Special Populations

💡 Tip: You can collapse this panel once you start building custom comparisons below.

Method Comparison Builder

0LV Mass

Active Methods (0/4)

No methods selected

Choose a preset above or add a custom method

185080
24(Normal)
UnderweightNormalOverweightObese
18.5
25
30
Reference line shows average female height (164 cm)

Absolute LV Mass Thresholds (g) by Selected Methods

Add series to visualize data

Hover over the chart to see detailed data point information

Click on a point to keep it pinned